She could have married a bibliophile instead, but he spent hours upon hours wandering aimlessly through the book store looking for something to read. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
We book readers can spend hours at a book store or a library searching for the perfect book. There are a lot of reasons for this. Maybe there are no good books to be found (very unlikely). Maybe there are so many good books available that it’s tough to pick the right one(s). Maybe there are non-book distractions that keep us from focusing. Maybe we’re feeling indecisive.
Choosing a book can be time consuming, but it doesn’t have to be. By following six quick steps, any reader can find a (probably) good book in a matter of minutes.
*****
1. Set the timer.
A time limit is important in choosing a book. Without that self-imposed limit, readers can waste valuable time searching and over-thinking possible book selections. Every second wasted picking a book is less time that we’ll have to read that book. We readers often leave a store with a stack of books that we’ll never get to. Setting a time limit will make that stack smaller while giving us more time to read.
DISCLAIMER: If you enjoy wandering through the book store or library just for the sheer joy of wandering through the book store or library, then disregard Step 1. Choosing a good book might not be your top priority.
****
2. Look for books with interesting titles.
Reading titles (while ignoring authors and book covers) means we can scan aisles of books very quickly. Each person has different criteria for what makes a good book title. I think I’ve been attracted to books with prepositional phrases in them. Talking to the Dead, The Power of Habit, The Lord of the Rings, Fifty Shades of Gray, A Game of Thrones, A Feast for Crows, A Clash of Kings, The Sword of Shannara, Love in a Nutshell, Rules of Civility, State of Wonder…
I haven’t read all the above books; I just initially gave them a second look because of their titles. I’m a sucker for prepositional phrases.
*****
3. Make sure the author is not on the DO NOT READ list.
Every reader’s DO NOT READ LIST is different. I don’t read more than three books by any author. I don’t read books in a series if the series hasn’t been finished yet. I rarely give (famous) authors a second chance if I disliked the first book of theirs that I read. And (as I pointed out last week) I don’t read books if there’s a hot chick with cleavage on the cover.
*****
4. Read the book jacket.
Everybody knows that reading a quick explanation of the book can be helpful, but it’s just as important to ignore any reviews that are on the jacket. The reviewers could be friends of the author. The reviewers could have been paid by the publisher. The reviewers might not have even read the book. Or the reviewers could have bad taste in books.
Readers are better off glancing at the plot summary and then moving on to the next step (if we choose).
*****
5. Read the first page (at least).
No explanation needed.
*****
6. Choose a random page and read (the dialogue).
I like to choose a random page just to verify that the quality of writing doesn’t deteriorate too much as the book continues. Some books start off strong but fall off quickly, and we readers are cheated. Perusing a random page might not prevent that from happening to us, but at least we give ourselves a chance.
I also check for dialogue on a random page. If the dialogue is unrealistic or too clever to be true, then I probably won’t read the book. Dialogue is important to me. Sometimes authors use dialogue to show how clever they are instead of using it to reveal their characters’ personalities.
Readers who don’t care about dialogue can still choose a random page and check the descriptions or exposition, or even the punctuation. The important thing is to make sure that the quality of writing meets our expectations throughout the whole book.
*****
Ever since I have begun this six-step process, I have spent more time reading books and less time searching. This doesn’t mean that every book I’ve picked out has been great. I’ve still chosen a couple disappointments that I didn’t finish. However, I feel less frustrated with a disappointing book now (unless I paid a lot of money for it) because I know that I didn’t waste time looking for it. And I still have a (smaller) stack of back up books that I have more time to read.
That’s the great thing about books. Even when a book sucks, there will always be a better one out there to replace it.

This is not the WORST BOOK COVER EVER. It’s the cover that led me to start thinking about book covers.
Since I’m not very observant sometimes, I might not be qualified to judge the worst book cover ever. I don’t notice when my wife has changed her hair. I don’t notice that I’ve worn the same shirt three days in a row (it’s been washed… we do a lot of laundry). I don’t notice that I’m wearing mismatched socks. And now I realize that I don’t look at book covers.
When I began reading Talking to the Dead by Harry Bingham a few days ago, all I noticed was the red cover. Then as I was reading, I noticed the blot on the cover made a picture. Oh, I thought, the cover means something! Maybe I should have noticed this before I started reading.
This didn’t just happen with Talking to the Dead. When I read The Power of Habit: (with a really long subtitle) by Charles Duhigg, all I noticed was yellow (maybe my new habit should be to pay more attention to book covers… or what my wife’s hair looks like). When I read The Bookseller by Mark Pryor, all I noticed was that there weren’t any books on the cover. I’ve read several other books over the last few weeks, and I can’t tell you what their covers look like.
If a book cover has a hot chick with cleavage on it, I’ll notice that right away. I might even stare at it (or glance briefly before I’m caught), but I won’t read that book. I can’t be seen reading a book with a hot chick with cleavage on the cover. It’ll make me look like a pervert, and I can’t have people think that I’m a pervert. That’s bad for my reputation.
There are several variations of the hot chick with cleavage book cover. There’s the hot chick with blood on her. There’s the hot chick with vampire teeth. There’s the hot chick holding a big gun (or other kind of weapon). The best is the bloody hot chick with vampire teeth holding a big gun. If I see a hot chick with a hot guy, then I know the book is a romance, and I’m not interested.
Yeah, I don’t read books that have hot chicks with cleavage on the covers, but I’m an expert on them.
The publishing industry thinks book covers are important. Every guide to self-publishing says to spend some money to have a professional graphics designer put together a book cover (or photograph/paint a hot chick with cleavage), but I don’t know. I don’t look at book covers until I’m halfway through the book. If everybody else is like me, then publishers are wasting their time and money (but I don’t think everybody is like me).
I think this happened when I started reading digital books. The pictures are so small on my phone (and other electronic devices) that it’s easy to ignore them. But this also extends to my book store and library selections now. Maybe I’m the exception.
I know that my reading habits are not normal. I quit books at the first moment I lose interest. I’ll tell other readers that books suck and feel no need to say anything else. I don’t read any more than three books from any author anymore. And now I know that I ignore book covers.
Lke I said earlier, maybe I’m not the most qualified person to judge a bad book cover, but I think I’ve found the worst.
And now without further ranting, I present what I think is the WORST BOOK COVER EVER!
The Iliad might literally be epic, but a bad translation can ruin it for a reader. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Even though finding a good book to read can be difficult, ruining a good book for somebody else is easy. It’s so easy that excited readers usually don’t realize they’re destroying somebody else’s pleasant experience. There are probably dozens of ways to ruin a good book for somebody else, but here are (the top?) four:
1. Sneezing on it
Sneezing on a book will always ruin it for me. I don’t want to touch any book after it’s been sneezed on, no matter how much I had originally wanted to read it. It’s not just the nose debris I’m worried about either. Any type of fluid (body or not), and I won’t read the book. The moist spots might be water, but I can’t take that chance.
The only books I check out from the library are the new ones because they’re relatively undamaged. All of the older books have warped areas, or discolored sections, or green/brown spots that can’t be sanitary whatever they are. The older books can be checked out for extended periods of time, but I wouldn’t want them infecting my house, not even for a day or two.
The possibility that somebody has sneezed (or done worse) to a book will keep me from reading it. This narrows my selection at the library a little, but that also keeps me from wandering the shelves, and my kids appreciate how quickly I can choose a book from the library.
2. Spoiling the Ending
When I was reading The Iliad in junior high (by choice… 30+ years ago), some wiseacre tried spoiling it by telling me the Greeks won the war. I smugly replied that I already knew that. Then the spoiling wisacre revealed to me that The Iliad doesn’t go all the way to the end of the war. I couldn’t believe it! I cheated and read the final chapter where Achilles returns Hector’s body to Peleus, and I was shattered. I was really looking forward to reading about the Trojan Horse.
Maybe The Iliad isn’t the best example of a novel (or epic poem) that can be ruined by a spoiler. I could have used a more recent novel (like Dennis Lehane’s Shutter Island), but readers could have potentially gotten mad at me (and I try to avoid conflict whenever possible). At least The Iliad is Greek mythology. It’s (almost) impossible to spoil Greek mythology anymore.
As bad as a spoiler can be, the fake spoiler can sometimes encourage a reluctant reader to finish a book. When I was in fourth grade (way more than 30+ years ago), my vulgar older brother told me that Tom Sawyer got Becky Thatcher pregnant in the caves in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. I eagerly read the entire book, searching in vain for an adult encounter that the Classics Illustrated comic book version didn’t have. I couldn’t find the adult scene, but I was too embarrassed to mention that to my vulgar older brother. I was afraid the scene was there and I hadn’t been wise enough to recognize it.
Maybe I fell for my vulgar older brother’s “fake dirty scene” trick, but I never painted any picket fences for him.
3. Assigning it as Required Reading
Most people aren’t going to read a classic unless it’s assigned reading for school. But a book doesn’t have to be a classic to be hated when assigned. I probably would have liked Fahrenheit 451 if it hadn’t been assigned. I probably would have liked Lord of the Flies as well.
There are only two exceptions. I liked To Kill a Mockingbird even though it was assigned, and I’m pretty sure I’d have hated Moby Dick even if it hadn’t been.
Assigning a novel is a great way to make kids hate (even what they think is) a good book. If you’re tired of The Hunger Games or Twilight or Beautiful Creatures, just get some teachers to make these books required reading. If a few teachers could overanalyze these books, the popularity of these YA novels would drop instantly.
Any teen craze can be destroyed by making it compulsory. If you’re sick of Justin Bieber or One Direction, have some music teachers require their classes to perform their songs. It’s an incredible power that teachers have to ruin teenage fads; they should use it more frequently.
4. Building up High Expectations
I probably would have liked The Catcher in the Rye if my friends in high school (about 30 years ago) hadn’t told me how awesome it was. The Catcher in the Rye was okay, but my friends had set my expectations too high. Holden Caulfield struck me as a whiner instead of a rebel. Now when I recommend a book, I just say something like “You might think this is good,” and not, “THIS BOOK CHANGED MY LIFE FOREVER!!!”
After my high school friends recommended The Catcher in the Rye, (“You HAVE to read it! It’s awesome. You won’t believe how great it is!”), I handed them a copy of Massage Parlor II by Jennifer Sills and said (probably in a monotone voice), “I think you’ll like this.”
That was it. No hyperbole. Very little emotion.
When I got my copy of Massage Parlor II back, it was in worse condition than any library book I’ve ever seen. If the kid sneezed on it, he sneezed on it a lot. Of course, I threw it away and scoured my hands. I then bought a new copy of Massage Parlor II and when I recommended it again to my other friends, I told them to buy their own copies.
That’s the final way to ruin a good book: make your literary peers buy their own copies.
Reading and writing may be awesome, but telling jokes about reading and writing can lead to silence and awkward coughing. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A literacy joke is risky to tell because most people either don’t care about reading and writing or won’t have enough background information to understand it. Even if the audience “gets” it, chances are they’ll still think the joke isn’t funny. You don’t need a master’s degree in English to “get” a Best Literacy Joke Ever! You might need to read a book every once in a while, though.
WARNING! Just because a Best Literacy Joke Ever is easy to understand, that doesn’t make it funny. It’s tough to write (and tell) a Stephen King joke.
*****
HACK WRITER vs. LITERARY AUTHOR
Stephen King, Janet Evanovich, and James Patterson were hanging out at a coffee shop bragging about how loyal their readers were.
“I could write five novels a year,” Stephen King said, “and my readers would purchase every book, no matter how poorly they were written.”
“Oh yeah?” Janet Evanovich proclaimed. “I could write ten novels a year, and my loyal readers would purchase every single one of them.”
“That’s nothing,” James Patterson scoffed. “I could write 15 novels a year, and my loyal readers would spend their money on all of them.”
Tom Wolfe overheard the conversation and became upset. “You are doing your readers a disservice with your hackery,” he said. “I took five years to write Back to Blood because I believe in giving my loyal readers my best effort.”
And with that, Tom Wolfe strolled away.
“I hate to say this,” Stephen King said, “but I didn’t think Back to Blood was very good.”
“I hate to say this,” Janet Evanovich said, “but I spend so much time writing all my books that I don’t have time to read anybody else’s writing.”
“I hate to ask this,” James Patterson said quietly, staring at Stephen King and Janet Evanovich, “but you guys actually write all your own books?”
*****
HOW CAN YOU BEAT WRITER’S BLOCK?
An overworked author was having writer’s block at the worst possible time. A deadline was approaching from his freelance job, he was working on his 100 blog posts in 100 days challenge, and he was writing a 50,000 word novel in a month all at the same time. The writer stared at his laptop screen, but he just couldn’t start writing.
Frustrated, the writer stood up and kicked his desk. Unfortunately, he wasn’t wearing shoes, and he jammed his big toe.
“Aaaaarrrrgh!” the writer screamed, hopping on his good foot from his den to the kitchen to get an ice pack. He accidentally tripped over his dog, lost his balance, and stumbled against the stove, flipping over a pot of boiling water that scorched his arm.
“Aiyeeeee!” the writer screamed, writhing in agony. His entire arm seared with pain, so he rushed to his car to drive himself to an emergency room. As he put the car into reverse, he saw smoke and flames from his kitchen. He had left the stove on, and somehow the kitchen had caught on fire.
“Nooooooo!” the writer screamed, leaping from his car, diving back into his house, holding his breath through the suffocating smoke, grabbing a fire extinguisher, and putting out the fire. As he almost breathed a sigh of relief (he couldn’t really breathe because of the smoke), he heard a loud crash. He had forgotten to set the emergency brake, and his car had rolled off the driveway and smashed into an old tree that hadn’t been removed yet from his lawn.
“AAAaaaaahhhhhh!” the writer screamed as he fled from his house just as the dying tree fell onto his home and crushed the roof. The fire had weakened the home’s structure, and entire house collapsed under the weight of the fallen tree.
The writer and his wife (who had been outside in the yard the whole time because she couldn’t stand to be around him when he was writing) stared at the rubble of what had been their home.
“At least now you have something to write about,” the wife said.
“I would,” the writer replied, exasperated. “But my laptop’s still in the house.”
*****
ANOTHER WRITER’S BLOCK JOKE
“Write about whatever you want to write about,” the English teacher said to his class as he paced across the room. “You have 10 minutes to express yourself through your writing, and fill up the entire page.”
“I don’t know what to write about,” a kid said, with a pen in his hand and paper on his desk.
“Write about what you are feeling,” the teacher suggested. “You have ten minutes.”
“I still don’t know what to write about,” the kid blurted out.
“Think about it quietly for a few minutes, so other students can concentrate while you decide what to write about,” the teacher said.
“I still can’t think of anything to write about,” the kid complained.
“Then just write ‘I don’t know what to write’!” the teacher finally snapped.
The kid scribbled furiously for about ten minutes but at least was quiet. When the teacher collected the assignment, he praised several students who had written in great detail about their feelings. When he got to the struggling kid’s assignment, he noticed that the entire page was composed of sentences saying: “I don’t know what to write about.”
The teacher crumpled up the kid’s (kind of) composition and threw it away. Outraged, the kid shouted, “Why did you throw away my essay?”
“Because you didn’t put any thought into it,” the teacher stated.
“Are you kidding?” the kid retorted. ‘That’s the first time I’ve ever written a whole page!”
*****
Read Dysfunctional Literacy on Amazon!
Retired author Philip Roth says writing is “torture.” Eat, Pray, Love author Elizabeth Gilbert says writing is “f*cking great.” I thought I had this figured out a couple days ago, when I concluded that I agreed with Gilbert’s comment but thought that Roth’s was way cooler.
But since then, I’ve put more consideration into how these varying philosophies apply to my own writing. I don’t mean that I’ve spent long hours of reflection where I suddenly wonder where the time has gone. I only do that at church. I mean that I gave it a couple moments of thought between books and chores and meals and errands.
WHY WRITING IS “F*CKING GREAT”
I write Dysfunctional Literacy with the personality I wish I had in my non-writing life. I’m a quiet guy. When I talk, I get ignored a lot. People yawn around me. I take a long time to speak because I’m careful with my words, so I get talked over while I’m completing my thoughts, and I’m not the type of person to say, “Shut up and let me finish, ***hole.”
It’s probably good that I don’t say things like that because it’s usually my bosses that interrupt me. The last guy that called one of my bosses an ***hole got escorted out of the building. My voice also has a slow tone to it, even when I try to speak quickly. I guess it’s like an invitation to be interrupted.
I don’t get interrupted when I write. I can take my time, choose my words carefully, and most of the time, I get it right. Even though I’m very careful with what I write at work, email is awesome because I never get interrupted, and co-workers can’t take credit for my ideas. Email is a (potentially backstabbing) friend that I use sparingly.
Dysfunctional Literacy is my way of blowing off steam. I can write about stuff that has nothing to do with my job, and I get feedback from a lot of other writers who are doing incredible things with their own blogs. And when I write, I can dream of the day when maybe, just maybe, I can make a living (or partial living) off of writing, and that would be “f*cking great.” But it’s still “f*cking great” doing it for free.
I don’t think it would be “f*cking great” writing for free for somebody else’s blog (like The Huffington Post), but if other writers are happy doing that, that’s “f*cking great” for them.
WHY WRITING IS TORTURE
Yeah, writing isn’t really torture, but it can be frustrating, and Philip Roth is an old man who was in an awkward situation when he said writing was “torture,” so I’m not going to take him literally.
I think about quitting Dysfunctional Literacy sometimes, just like Philip Roth retired from writing, except maybe our reasons are different and his career is a bit more accomplished than mine. Every night when I’ve written or edited something for Dysfunctional Literacy or other projects, I wonder if I’ve just wasted my time.
I have to be realistic. All this time, energy, and effort might turn out to be pointless. I get mad and frustrated when I write. I’m kind of unpleasant to be around when I write, so much so that I’m usually left alone. Plus, I don’t make any money off of it.
The good news is that I’m always in a great mood when I’m done.
It’s not necessarily the writing process that’s torture; it’s the idea that I might be wasting my time with it. But I’m pretty sure if I don’t write, then I’d be angry with myself later on in life for not trying. But that’s the mental “torture” (too strong a word, but you know what I mean) that anybody who has a non-profitable passion has to deal with.
FINAL VERDICT
I asked the question, so I have to make the tough decision. Writing is “f*cking great” because it’s the only time I have a personality. Writing is “torture” because I probably put far too much time into it and I’m kind of an ***hole while I’m concentrating. Well, I need to have a personality, so I guess that makes writing “f*cking great,” and my family can do without me for a while every night .
For all I know, that time I spend writing might be my family’s favorite part of the day. So much for “torture.”
Philip Roth (retired author of novels like… okay, I have to admit that I’ve never read any of his books, but I know who he is) said something either really awesome or really silly about writing to a young(?) author whose first novel is called Balls:
“I would quit while you’re ahead. Really. It’s an awful field. Just torture. Awful. You write and you write, and you have to throw almost all of it away because it’s not any good. I would say just stop now. You don’t want to do this to yourself. That’s my advice to you.”
If you don’t know the context behind the quote, here is a pretty good summary and analysis.
Maybe Roth’s statement was kind of silly. “Torture” is probably too strong a word (yeah, I know he’s not being literal!), but writing can be frustrating, especially when some young punk writer interrupts your meal.
I hate being interrupted while I’m eating. I really hate it when it’s by somebody that I don’t know. If a writer can’t enjoy eating at a restaurant without being accosted by a creepy (speculation on my part) waiter with a book, then what’s the point of being a writer?
Nobody wants to think about a book titled Balls while eating dinner. The last thing I want to think of while I’m eating is somebody else’s Balls. Even if I wrote a book called Balls, I wouldn’t want to think about it while eating. That was incredibly insensitive of the writer/waiter who interrupted Roth’s meal.
Philip Roth is an old man who had his meal interrupted, so I give him a pass on anything that he said during that conversation. Besides, I like old men who say what they want (as long as it’s not racist or homophobic… and even then it’s funny sometimes).
Elizabeth Gilbert (author of Eat, Pray, Love, a book I’ve never read even though those are three things that I do) responded to Roth’s quote by saying writing is “f*cking great.” For some reason, that reminds me of Julia Roberts saying “I love my life” while handing out an Oscar a few years ago.
It’s nice to love your life or think writing is “f*cking great,” but those are easy stands to take when you’re rich and famous. It’s more difficult to love your life or think writing is f*cking great when you’re unknown and struggling. Don’t get me wrong. I love my life too. I just don’t announce it at inappropriate times. I also think writing is f*cking great. That’s why I write my blog for free. I wouldn’t write Dysfunctional Literacy for free if I thought writing sucked (or thought it was torture).
I agree with Elizabeth Gilbert’s comment more than I agree with Philip Roth’s, but I think that Philip Roth is way cooler than Elizabeth Gilbert, so I resent Gilbert for her comment that I agree with, and I appreciate Roth for his comment that I probably don’t really understand.
It’s kind of weird how the human brain works.



